Sunday, July 22, 2007

Emergent Density Final Review

Final review of the Emergent Density module. Friday 20th of July 2007:
The last weeks of work culminated in the final review. The board of critics included Oliver Bertram, head of the company Different Futures and Assistant at Greg Lynns studio of the Angewandte and Rainer Zettl, Assistant at W.D. Prix studio and main coordinator of Urban Strategies. The allover quality of the body of work was appreciated by the board, and some good advises were given about possible further proceedings with the learnt design strategies. It was interesting to see that despite the general design strategy the final results formed a variety of possible solutions. Some projects approched the problem by creating an allover connected architectural entity. Other approaches included the dissolving of mass in fibrous entities, and the creation of cellular aggregations.

Friday, July 20, 2007

GroupPresentation

Chfwu79 Pres




















Miha Volgemut pres







TOPOLOGY















One continuous surface

EXTENSIVE vs. INTENSIVE










Building is not measurable, it is configurated with changeable parameters.

STRATIFICATION













Interdependent layering of floors - usable outside area of floors.

EMERGING POPULATION






































MANIPULATION MAP

































TOPMOD SCREENSHOT













PROJECT

Deformation of topology



















Creating architectural condition














Urban body...interiorization of streets...redefining the communication corridors














Researching urban anatomy...area of the site: 700x450m














Section 1 - urban scale











Section 2 - architectural scale



















Cityscape










































3D print













ReinhardPres




Gradient
















Stratification












Topology
















AbstractMachines























Analysis

















Analysis














Strategie for the final result


















Final result














Model

























Aspern area

YuePres










































































paluePres









Gradient:
















Eifel Tower, Paris


Topology:











WOS 8 is a Heat Transfer Station, Leidsche Rijn, Netherlands 1998


Transition:










Holocaust Memorial at Berlin, Peter Eisenman

Abstract Machines:





































Extensive Maps:














wire manipulations
creating two models
1. model: deformation of the plane surface into a tube
2. model: changing the genus of the surface through additional openings

Intensive Maps
Focus on effects:



































































Machinic Translations:





























Creating three affiliated cells:




































Different Viewpoints of the three cells:








Agglomeration of the three affiliated cells



WebThomyPres








Gradient








Stratification












Transition









AbstractMachines


















ExtensiveMap









IntensiveMap










focus on stratification effects









section analysis


















Model1









Model2










Model3









Model4

Thursday, July 19, 2007

PinUpAbstractMachines1




PinUpAbstractMachines2





PinUpabstractMachines3





Miha Volgemut, 3D Print1

Here you can see some images of Miha´s Model,
also fresh out of the printer and dedusted. You can compare it to the project here.

Something important for those who have to pic up their model at the 3D Fabrication Lab of the Angewandte. You should get a Spray can of clear acrylic paint and cover your models with a coat of paint. This increases the stability of the model. You will have to be careful with this models anyways, but it helps.





ZülfiyeIntensive Map

"Spiral Reality" (2)

The parts with transition. Like paravane but the thing continue in wholeness.
From inside to outside to the other dynamic in terms of changes but in the same time could be able to read as history and the ability to have description in the whole system.
The vertical rise and horizontal movement. From one to the other parts connections and same points..

Regarding to concept and its elements


Basic issues & instruments:
•Dynamism
•Harmony-Topographic wholeness
•Differency but relationship / more than communicaiton !
•Spiral Shape: it looks the same if you observe the movement but always different in fact.
You see the spiral movement you think you are in the same spiral movement-yes it is- but not in the same spiral ( the same point of the spiral) the movement is the same but the material is not and also behavioral changes form the reality..

The points are unique and that are not developing in linear way but spiral and more connected to each other .

Yesterday ( history) today and tomorrow are connected but always different means in different point in the spiral reality but they are communicating to each other instead of creating the reality again, connecting this to the existing one and creating together the “future one “…
This saves energy!
Things could seem as “same” but this is actually “similarity” and you see the differency if you focus on. Differency not so much visible to express themselves so much but a little bit in order to describe and put them in the correct order .That is the point .
If you make some of them much more visible than the others then the balance will change ..!

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

MIhaUrban body II

























































MihaUrban body

I am now researching urban conditions in the model of dimensions 700 x 450m. It is revealing itself as an urban body... a house and a city at one time. The communication corridors are organic - continuous, that means there's no distinction between street, hallway, stairs, elevator, subway... they are all interiorised and intertwined with each other, there are electric cars and transportation. The anatomy of the object is similar to the living body anatomy with veins, organs and functions. So this urban body is a building block, neighborhood and a city center at one time. Beside highly internal connectivity it is also connected to outside world with subway and car traffic under the ground. Quality of living and working in such a "city" is just a state of evolutionary adaptation of humans to environmental conditions. Our environment is rapidly changing, the direct sun is more and more harmful and the daylight is disturbing factor in the digital environment, also outside air is polluted, especially on the streets with traffic smog and noise. And for experiencing the outside qualities there is still a lot of outside space in the holes of the body, from small ones to large public squares, which are a matter of choice and not the necessity.
I am also wandering about the consciousness of the body. Consciousness of the city is the place of terrible mistake, where something is going terribly wrong. Consciousness is dynamic, but can we capture it in the moment with identifiable space/object? Maybe just half real and half symbolic - object out of context, ruining the space configuration, disturbing the balance... So, I placed the cultural program in the charismatic corner of the body, where something is not right, mutation of topology is creating new condition, new exit.

P.S. I am trying to make 3d model more precise with some urban and architectural elements, but it's hardly possible with mesh mode. How can I transform mash object into surface?





















































































Sunday, July 15, 2007

Reinhard Hacker 3D print 1

Here are a couple of images fresh out of the 3D manufacturing Lab of the Angewandte. The model is "still warm" so to speak. This is the 1:500 section model of Reinhard Hackers project. Which shows us right away Do´s and Dont´s of 3D printing..









And this it what happens if you make your model pieces too skinny, they just fall apart when you try to get the out of the dust of the 3D printer:

Saturday, July 14, 2007

chfwu79MachinicTranslation1

_ intensive vs extensive
Genotype

I try to use two different manipulations to transform genotype into phenotype.

I. Based on the temporal condition (the same viewpoint but at different time)



(Phenotype is the interaction between genotype and the environment)


II. Based on the spatial condition (some quality of space was creared)



PS. I am not sure whether "these bones" could be printed. Any suggestion ?

Friday, July 13, 2007

WebthomyMachinicTranslation1

hi, please note...my images are already only screen prints...and i will do some sections for my analysis...

SaM: your goal was to create a kind of 'gradient of openings' through manipulation of the wire by cutting out openings of different sizes- in addition to the existing hexagonal micro openings of the wire itself. Then you applied the plaster in layers (please add a description of the individual layer's viscosity, e.g. viscosity was nearly the same or I started with layers of low viscosity....; add an approximate number of layers, direction of application)

SaM: Your analysis of the stratification should also cover the various layers that created this expected and unexpected results (think about varying line weight for each plaster application)
then you write about the exciting effects that were created through the aggregation of the plaster around the mid-size? openings.(here you should point out which openings in the wire created this effect)
To demonstrate and examine the cause and effects of this process you are focusing from now on, and that will form the basis for the development of your project, you need a SECTIONAL analysis of the plaster model too.


SaM: Good start,
just two comments:
In your physical model several layers of - we guess - high viscous plaster created this voluptious areas and spaces we've been talking about at the last table crit. (the sectional analysis of your plaster model will help you create more intricate connections)
Within your digital model you tried - too fast - to come to an result that can be interpreted as an architectural or urbanistic situation - the layering effect that created this overhanging effects is missing.
You are right by writing that this structure is open ended, but by repeating the method you apply for your digital model endlessly you might reach a dead end.
1. Think how the method you applied horizontally might develop gradually into a vertical system.
and/or
2. add elements of disturbance or disruption to your system - we want to develop methodologies and design strategies that create behavioural elements, elements that have the capacity to create something unexpected. For example: This moments of disruption or distortion could start at a micro scale taking over or dying back/off as the method is deployed into verticality etc.etc...

ZulfiyeMachinicTranslation1







Top Mod Modelling



ReinhardMachinicTranslation1






























































































































































































































































Thursday, July 12, 2007

Final Review 20th of July...

Dear Students:
We have confirmation for our final Review: It will take place Friday the 20th of July.
Guests will include Wolf. D. Prix, Reiner Zettl and Oliver Bertram.
It will be an evening session from 6pm to 7.30pm. So everyone of you will have aprox. 15 min. of time from presenting. So rehearse your presentations, and densify them to the max! Press the juice out of it!

Furthermore there will be the chance to 3D print on this weekend at the Angewandte, so get in contact with me if you want to make use of the chance, which I highly recommend.

One more thing: Post your results in the blog, we haven´t seen much lately!

PalueMachinicTranslation3Comment

Thank you Palue for keeping us informed

We'd like you to keep focused on the second step of your work - the green series

As we still think that the maps are an important step in the development of your projects here we posted a few suggestions:
you started creating a tubular and a planar physical model
















then you've been analyzing your planar model focusing on the stratification effects depicted on this image












overlapping your tubular and planar physical model created the basis for your project













you started analyzing the planar model - in the following images we provide you with a possible analysis of the tubular model, which should help you (and all others on the blog) to overcome the massing problem and to create the swellings we are talking about constantly ;)

















































the next images focus on the good start of the 3D translation into the digital model

the model already translates the ideas of massing and stratification effects starting in the center, but also how this swellings would behave on the additional handles (red rectangle)










here the representation of the stratification process is depicted most successfully








gravitational effects are created - also on the left were the boundary condition starts to dissolve by forcing it -carefully - from a planar condition into 3D

PalueMachinicTranslation3

My latest model! Sorry for the bad renderings . . . I realized a thikness surface and concerning the design I tried to emerge space, density and connected with the appearence of density gradient behaviour. Further I tried to reach a certain agglomeratio of mass at the edges (as we can obeserve it in the plastermodels) of the model - but this effect is unfortunately more visible in the TopMod model! I will see what I can do during the day to get a more mass like structure - means adding some more structural elements in TopMod . . .










Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Rind Modeling (Thickness)

Hello!

One further question - is rind modeling necessary to print our models? As we experienced while launching rind modeling "negative effects" emerge.

Concerning printing I will start off tomorrow !

Friday, July 6, 2007

Speed Pinup, Thursday July 5th.



PaluesMachinicTranslation2

My latest model! Sorry for the bad renderings . . . I realized a thikness surface and concerning the design I tried to emerge space, density and connected with the appearence of density gradient behaviour. Further I tried to reach a certain agglomeratio of mass at the edges (as we can obeserve it in the plastermodels) of the model - but this effect is unfortunately more visible in the TopMod model! I will see what I can do during the day to get a more mass like structure - means adding some more structural elements in TopMod . . .













. . . . . first these pictures as a new approach! In my opinion here especailly the gradient behaviour and the emergence of topological space appear. Local dense areas are stressed as you can see in the front view and in the side view lower densed areas on the right side of the model.


Front view

Side view


Top view


Top view

Side view


Top Side view

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey ! Here is one possible prototype! Further extensions will follow for tomorrow . . .




At the same time I am working on the description concerning the terms! Yes for sure ! . . . and the maps will be added too on the blog . . . .

Update . . . . there are not really changes made; because - to be honest - I lost for a moment my conviction AND one further step with the right above model which is not visible here produced an error importing him to Maya! I dont know why. So I started with the model you see at the top!



3dprint of "one" part of the entire model

Hey ! !

Matias, please could you you give a short description how the 3dprint of "one" part of the entire model works in Zprint. You told Reinhard how it works . . . i will try to figure it out by myslef but there are still other things which are more important now!

thx a lot,

Peter

Thursday, July 5, 2007

YuePresMachinicTranslation050707



















chfwu79PresMachinicTranslation050707












PaluePresMachinicTranslation050707

Gradient Term:

As a gradient building I choosed the Eifel tower, which is for sure more an architectural monumet then a building but its shape and construction logic is obviously. The entire infrastructure (stairs, elevator) is constantly smooth shaped focusing to the middel platform and finaly to the top of the tower where visitors can rest.




Transition Term:

The Holocaust Memorial at Berlin by Eisenman, I choosed, because it is a site which is transited by people every day visiting or just crossing it so it is as a part of the infrastructre a kind of a public space. Looking at the site from top view, standing at his boarder or even standing in the center of the field it doesn't matter you have in each viewpoint an other perspective different in gradient, topology and posibility to transit.







Topological Term:

Choosing buildings with an contextual connection to the term of topology I chosed at first the Heat Transfer Station by NL Architect. This buildings connects spatial and surficial qualities in its architecture but still keeps a simple structure. Even its material or more precisely its smooth shaped look gives the building an unique optical appearance. One gets the feeling to be able to shape or deform the building like a block of gum - motivated by the hole located at the one corner.






Preparation of the chickenwire before adding plaster on it . . .


Side view on tube . . . (1.)

Look in the tube view . . . (2.)


Detail view in the tube . . . (3.)


Detail view in the tube . . . (4.)


Look in the tube view . . . (5.)


Detailed side view on the vertical curved plane . . . (6.)


Side view on the curved plane . . . (7.)

Microscopic elements at the boarder of the holes in the macroscopic dominant verticle fixed curved chickenwire . . . (8.)

Characteristics for transition I observed in

Transition fluid structure in the vertical fixed plaster model. Picture 9.


in picture 9., where a fluid like structure is observable in the vertical fixed plaster model or in

Picture 10.

picture 10. where a in layers movement during the layer adding process in the tube fixed plaster model is observable and in



Picture 11.

picture 11. one can observe the already dried but still visible growth-process of the stalactite like structures inside the tube during the building procedure.


Analysing the first results and modeling experiences with plaster and chickenwire:

I started with a working model characterized by holes which are designed like "doors" or "windows" - means the cutted-off wings remain on one side fixed in the wire plane. I placed some of them randomly across the plane just paying attention that they are opened equaly to both sides. I shaped the plane in a arbitrary way - just not to have a flat plane surface. Hanging the model fixed on wire in the z-y-plane so that the wings are opened up and down.

Putting the plaster in the first step from above - moving to and fro - over the chickenwire nothing remained fixed in the hexagonal wire structure. Almost everthing was falling directly on the ground. Adding more plaster to the water-plaster-solution by the second and further steps the plaster gets accumulated at the top of the wire and at the wings of the holes. Now the entire covering of the wire is a question of the number of layers one adds to the plane. But still almost the greatest plaster accumulation is at the top but with gradient like baviour reducing in the thikness down to the edge of a hole or to the end of the chickenwire. I turned the entire chickenwire ones by 180 degree and repeated the procedure adding plaster - the effect is now basically mirrored - but this mirrored effect may cause the microscopic structures (Picture 8.) at the edge of the holes in the vertical fixed plane wire.

The next experiences I made with a tubed wall model. The effect is similar to the horizontal fixed flat or smooth curved chickenwire we can observe at Mihas model. As the photographs by Miha (horizontal, third picture) and me (horizontal tube, third picture) exhibit. Like in a stalactite cave the plaster is dropping layer by layer through the chickenwire, building up these littel towers in the center of each hexagonal part covering almost the entire pattern.

As Miha and I discussed in the last two days there are basically two possibilities. First the vertical and second the horizontal fixed chickenwire plane. Looking at the vertical postion the dominant effect is the gradient behaviour - accumulation at the top and successive reduction of the tickness of the plaster; primary macroscopic curvation of the wire is taking effect - like wholes, strong curvation or hughe rips like Thomas did it. Microscopic - means details like single hexagonal manipulation - are in relation to big scale curvation in the entire not well recognizable. Concerning the horizontal position - how Miha did it already - one can work on a much more microscopic level.

Regarding my chosen term - topology, gradient and transition - the gradient is the most obviously observable term (thanks to gravity)! The accumulation at the top of the vertical fixed and horizontal tube wire (see pictures 1., 5. and 6.) emerged by the consistency of the plaster and the amount of layer add on the wire. To stress topological characteristics for the vertical fixed plane wire I curved the plane and made holes in it. The plaster did not cover the holes -like expecte - but pave the way accumulating framelike around the hole. As I mentioned above the more macroscopical (thick accumulations) appearance of the resulting structures in the vertical fixed plane one can observe here - at the boarder of the holes - single microscopic detail structures too (Picture 8.). Characteristics for transition are visible in the parts where the plaster shows fluid liked curved traces (see pictures 9. and 10.) and the still visible - evene it is dried - development of the stalactite growing process (Picture 11.).
By choosing the tube curvature for the second working model I already get an interesting space structure which stresses simple but specific topolgical characteristics like the stalactite shaped towers emerged by the hexagonal pattern of the chickenwire. Here in opposite to the vertical wire the microscopic elements dominates (Pictures 3., 4. and 11.) - at least inside the tube. On the top of the tube there is - like expected - the accumulation and the starting gradient behaviour of the plaster towards the sloping curvature of the wire (Picture 1.). The observed transition structure is similar to the vertical fixed model (Pictures 9. and 10.).


Approaches modelling a UrbanMonster by TopMod:





First steps with TopMod creating a simple grid like structure



First steps with TopMod creating a grid like structure



First steps with TopMod creating a grid like structure



Second step connecting simple grid like structure with a medium like plaster



. . . adding a plane to the TopMod object !














Wednesday, July 4, 2007

MihaPresMachinicTranslation050707

Topology
The volume and the number of holes is fixed.



























Extensive vs. intensive
Extensive parameters are proximity, hight, depth... of building volumes.
Intensive forces create the urban field - high rises in the middle deform the grid and create large public spaces - emergent density in the center of the field.








































Stratification
...is effect of court deformation to public space. Their architectonic is climatic shelters for public areas.














HackerReinhardPresMachinicTranslation050707

Turn existing situation into small public place


Turn existing situation into urban building blocks

Turn existing situation into high density areas - skyscraper


Turn existing situation into big open public square



What you can see here is more a urban abstract conzept as a real based masterplan




The system is open to the neighborhood - This kind of "arms" can be the connection between different districts





The system is smooth, flexible and open for all






The way of thinking is 3D or 4D not 2D (figure-ground planning,...)























Monday, July 2, 2007

MihaMachinicTranslationFirstTry

It's an area about 400x700m. I took measures of city blocks as an extensive tectonic and as topological elements, which changes shape, typology (blocks to towers)...?(It's a delicate and not very accurate I know...will think further) Dancing dynamics of blocks is run by forces, which are intensive moments...?
I can't think of stratification yet, maybe it'll come to my mind...
I don't know yet how to avoid grid when we are designing city, I'll think further. At least will go towards less rigid grid...



























Sunday, July 1, 2007

TMIntroduction